Author: redjfg

Lake County IL Wrongful Death Attorney 847-395-2200

Verdict: $4,101,500

Date: February 2011

County: Cook

Plaintiff Medical: Dr. Richard L. Gamelli (Burns) and Dr. Rebecca Pifer (Emergency Medicine)

Plaintiff Experts: Kevin Lynch, IBEW/NECA Technical Institute (Electrical Safety) and Benjamin D. Miller, P.E. (Electrical Engineer) DEF Experts: Tage Carlson, Ph.D. (Safety) and Andrew J. Nehalfen, Ph.D. (Electrical Engineer)

Summary: Electrician, Charles Ingolia, was instructed to clean a switchgear cabinet at the CTA Substation. While doing so, believing it was de-energized, he raised a protective shield exposing himself to 12,600 volts of electricity and causing an explosion. Mr. Ingolia died three days later. The Estate contended that Defendant was at fault for not informing Mr. Ingolia that a portion of the electrical equipment was energized. Defense stated that Mr. Ingolia had been a journeyman electrician for 38 years and should have assume the equipment to be “live”, he ignored a warning sign, and lifted his protective shield exposing himself to the live equipment and explosion.

KNOW YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. GET A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION.

Getting the maximum workers’ compensation settlement you’re entitled to is a job for an experienced worker’s compensation attorney with a winning record. Attorney Bob Edens and his staff have recovered millions of dollars for people whose injuries were caused through no fault of their own. Bob Edens has earned the trust of injury victims throughout Lake County, IL by handling their cases with both experience and dignity. Bob will sit down with you personally and go over the facts of your case in detail. With these facts in hand, Bob will put his experience into providing you with a clear and honest explanation of your options. The consultation is FREE. You are under no obligation and there is never any pressure to sign an agreement. If you do retain Bob and his staff to represent you, no fees will be charged until a fair settlement or verdict is secured on your behalf.

So call Attorney Bob Edens and put his 20+ years’ experience to work for you. He has convenient offices located throughout Lake County. Call Bob at 855-760-6746 for a free, no-obligation legal consultation. The call is free, the information may be priceless.

The Call Is FREE, The Advice Might Be Priceless!

GET A FREE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAW BOOK FOR INJURED EMPLOYEES

12 Things Every Injured Worker Must Know-FREE to All Illinois Injured Workers

Get Your Free Book By Clicking Here

12 Things You MUST Know About Your Workers’ Compensation Claim

An Essential Guide For People Injured On The Job

Award Winning Author and Attorney Bob Edens’ Book, “12 Things You MUST Know About Your Workers’ Compensation Claim,” ™ is a Step-by-Step Guide for Employees Who Have Been Injured On The Job.

In 12 Things You MUST Know About Your Workers’ Compensation Claim Bob explains the ins and outs of the worker’s compensations claims process from the time of injury to the time of settlement or trial. Bob provides basic facts about:

• The filing of the claim and negotiation from start to finish;
• How to negotiate a settlement for injuries sustained from a wide variety of cases including all types of injuries including repetitive injuries such as Carpal Tunnel, back strain or falls.
• Tips on how to deal with adjusters and avoiding the pitfalls and traps they hope you fall into;
• Tips on how to determine the value of your injuries; and,
• An overview of questions and legal issues that most injured workers have.

THIS FREE BOOK IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO INJURED EMPLOYEES IN ILLINOIS

ALL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM YOUR SUBMISSION WILL BE HELD IN STRICT CONFIDENCE.

The damages from an accident may seem unreal when they are reduced to numbers on a page. However, a car accident settlement calculator can give you a ballpark figure to determine if your case is worth pursuing. It would help your Woodstock car accident lawyer determine a figure they can fight for on your behalf if the other driver was at fault.

How a Settlement Calculator Works

The software that powers a settlement calculator is based on a simple formula that is a close-kept secret in insurance companies. Insurance adjusters use these to process claims, and no two may be alike. Some of the data these calculators rely on include info regarding:

• Medical treatment.
• Pain and suffering rate.
• Property damage.
• Lost earnings.
• Impact on lifestyle.

Some calculators are designed to use a multiplier method. This tactic multiplies the value of economic damages (such as property damage and medical bills) with a number between 1.5 and 5 to determine pain and suffering. For severe injuries, the factor can go as high as 6 to 10.

When Settlement Calculators Don’t Work

Settlement calculators are an easy and quick way to figure out what an accident claim is worth and what your Woodstock car accident lawyer should consider. However, each case is different.

The calculator’s results may show figures less than what your claim is worth. Even if someone got into a similar accident, they might get a different settlement amount from yours. Some of the factors that affect the settlement amount include:

Severity of Injuries

If your injuries are life-threatening or severe enough to merit a hospital stay, you may receive a higher settlement than if they were minor. Insurance companies don’t want to be sued, so they may try and settle out of court if your claim is valid.

Number of Medical Bills

Insurance companies also look at how many medical bills a claimant has accumulated post-accident before considering a settlement. Naturally, a large number will increase the settlement amount. You should be reimbursed for the maximum amount or all of it.

Recovery Duration

If you sustain injuries that require months of rest and treatments to heal, you may be entitled to a higher settlement. The at-fault driver will have to pay for the bills, the wages you may lose out on as you recuperate, your pain and suffering, and other damages that an experienced Antioch car accident lawyer deems necessary.

At this point, you need a car accident attorney in your corner who can ensure the insurance company and the defendant don’t coerce you into a lower settlement than you deserve.

Contact The Law Offices Of Robert T. Edens For A Consultation Today!

At The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, we have been fighting for the rights of accident victims such as you for more than two decades. Our Antioch car accident lawyers are well-versed in personal injury cases as it is our main focus. If you or someone you know has been injured seriously in a car accident and the insurance company is being uncooperative, contact us today. We can develop a legal strategy to ensure you get the maximum settlement you deserve.

Verdict: Not Guilty

Date: December 2010

County: Lake

PLTF Medical: Dr. Malcolm Bilimoria (Oncologist) and Dr. Ermilo Barrera (Oncologist)

PLTF Experts: Barrett Sachs, D.P.M. (Podiatrist, Dr. Alfred Torrence (Internist) and Charles Linke, Ph.D. (Economist)

DEF Experts: Dr. Daniel Derman (Internist), Dr. Timothy Kuzel (Oncologist), Ronald Sage, D.P.M. (Podiatrist)

Summary: Plaintiff saw his general practitioner, Dr. Huang, for problems with the 4th toe on his left foot. Dr. Huang prescribed antibiotics for a presumed infection and referred him to a podiatrist. 1 month later, Plaintiff saw a podiatrist, Dr. Brown. Dr. Brown diagnosed an abscess infection and prescribed more antibiotics. The culture came back positive for staph infection. Plaintiff returned to Dr. Brown 1 week later. His condition had improved but a black spot was still on his toe.

Plaintiff returned to Dr. Huang complaining of a lump in his groin. Plaintiff was diagnosed with malignant melanoma which began beneath the nail of his left 4th toe. Plaintiff died 1 year later at the age of 52. The estate contended that the physicians failed the standard of care required. Further that Dr. Huang had a duty to ensure that a biopsy was performed even after the patient saw a podiatrist.

The defense argued that an earlier diagnosis would not have changed the outcome based on the extent of metastasis. The outcome of Plaintiff’s melanoma was determined more by the type of cancer rather than the timing of diagnosis or treatment.

Category: Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death