Wrongful Death in Workers’ Compensation? Not Exactly

The Illinois workers’ compensation system, much like systems across the country, was designed to provide injured workers with a mechanism for recovery from injury that was less costly and faster than litigation. Before the system was created, injured employees whose employers did not take responsibility for their injuries had to take the employer to court and prove that it was liable before they were able to obtain benefits. Such a system was heavily in the employer’s favor as most employees could not afford to fight their employer in court and receive care for their injuries at the same time. After the creation of the workers’ compensation system, employees who were injured while performing the duties of their position were able to obtain immediate care at the expense of their employer. One area into which this system extends is with regard to death benefits.

“Death Benefits,” or more aptly, Survivors’ Benefits

Unlike lawsuits under wrongful death statutes, families of workers who are killed while on the job must seek any recovery for their loss under Illinois’ workers’ compensation statutes. This is because the family of the worker essentially steps into the place of their loved one and accepts benefits in his or her stead. Not all family members are entitled to survivors’ benefits, however, as the statute specifies exactly who may recover for the loss. According to Illinois law, full benefits are payable to the spouse and/or children of the deceased worker. These benefits continue indefinitely until the spouse remarries, or the children reach a certain age (with an exception for dependents who are physically or mentally disabled). If the worker has no spouse or children, the survivors’ benefits can be payable to any dependent parents, grandparents, or other heirs who were “at least 50% dependent” on the employee at the time of his or her death.

As stated previously, the workers’ compensation system is designed to ensure that workers receive prompt and effective care for injuries, without regard to who was at fault for the incident causing the injury. This system protects employers as much as employees and was designed to provide as much of a “win-win” situation as possible whenever a traumatic event occurs in the workplace. Employers benefit from less time they must operate without the injured employee because faster treatment often leads to less time the employee is out of work. Further, both parties are encouraged to continue to move forward after an incident rather than become embroiled in protracted litigation to prove who or what was at fault for the accident. This system can provide closure in the event of an employee’s death for the employer as well as the survivors by allowing for a mechanism through which the circumstances surrounding a loved one’s death is neither ignored nor drawn out unnecessarily.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.

Need a guide?

Even though the workers’ compensation system was designed to allow for fairly swift recovery in the event a loved one is injured or killed in the workplace, there are rules that must be followed in order for a survivor to recover the benefits to which they are entitled. If you or a loved one has been injured in the workplace and you have questions about recovering against an employer, call the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. in Antioch today. Our attorneys have years of experience fighting to protect workers and ensure that they receive what they are owed quickly, despite an employer’s recalcitrance.

 

Euthanization of Vicious Dog Heads to Lake County Court

The case of a dog that was scheduled to be euthanized in 2013 after several case of biting people over a five year span will be reviewed in Lake County Court today. According to authorities the dog had bitten a person in Florida several years ago, and several people in Hawthorn Woods between 2008 and 2012, thus being deemed vicious. After the owners brought the dog back to Hawthorn Woods the dog yet again attacked in 2013, when a court order was issued to have the dog put down.

Robert Edens is a Lake County personal injury lawyer who also represents victims of animal attacks, including dog bite injuries. To schedule a free consultation contact our offices today at (847) 395-2200.

 

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens

Illinois Focus: Modified Comparative Negligence in Slip and Fall Cases

When many people hear the phrase “slip and fall” they often have an image in their mind that includes dollar signs.  While it is difficult to determine why such a commonplace accident carries with it the expectations of a very large damage award, there is little argument that such cases are big business. Before a victim can recover, however, they must understand the law in Illinois so that their expectations are equal to their potential award.  Not only can this understanding aid the individual through the litigation process, but it can also aid them in making an educated decision with regard to settlement.

Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence is a legal concept that many states have adopted in response to plaintiffs whose recovery of damages was completely barred because of traditional contributory negligence laws.  These laws essentially state that if a plaintiff shared any of the fault for the accident, regardless how little, they could not recover any damages from the (also negligent) defendant.  By adding comparative negligence as a possibility, state lawmakers provided a way for these plaintiffs to obtain a more equitable result.

In the field of comparative negligence, it is possible to have two types: pure and modified.  The latter is used in Illinois as the law applies to personal injury litigation for slip and fall accidents.  The difference between the two types of comparative negligence essentially comes down to how damages are calculated.  In pure situations, the jury or judge will calculate the plaintiff’s damages and then reduce them by the percent of negligence that was attributable to their actions.  With modified situations, the percentage of fault that falls on the plaintiff is still calculated, but it only matters if it rises to 50% or higher.  In other words, unless the plaintiff is 50% at fault (or higher), they will recover full damages.

Slip and Fall, Specifically

It is important for a plaintiff to consider where they stand in a slip and fall case, before making any decisions that might affect their final recovery or settlement amount.  If, for example, a plaintiff knows that the defendant has a potentially dangerous display in its store and the plaintiff takes an action that they know is likely to cause the display to fall, that plaintiff may be found to be partially at fault for any resulting injury by the display.  The defendant in this situation is not completely off the hook as it has a duty to create displays that are not likely to cause harm to innocent patrons.  However, the plaintiff is not 100% innocent either, if they knowingly took advantage of a defendant’s negligence.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.

 

Know Your Rights
Before walking into a courtroom or approaching a defendant with a settlement offer, one of the best actions an injured person can take is to speak to someone with knowledge of Illinois laws as they apply to slip and fall cases.  Do not let a corporate defendant off the hook for the negligence of its employees, or allow it to use comparative negligence principles to bully you into an unfair settlement.  If you have been injured in a slip and fall accident, call the Lake Zurich attorneys at the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. today for a consultation.  Our attorneys can advise you and provide representation to ensure that your rights are fully protected.

 

 

Man Killed in Hit-and-Run Near Buffalo Grove

A Lake County man died earlier this week after he was struck by a vehicle in front of his house near his mailbox. Investigators say the vehicle was travelling west on Pope Blvd. near North Eugene Avenue in unincorporated Prairie View near Buffalo Grove when it hit several mailboxes and also struck the man. The crash remains under investigation.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens is an auto accident and wrongful death law firm representing injury victims throughout Lake County and the state of Illinois. Contact us today at (847) 395-2200 for a free consultation.

 

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.

 

When School’s In Session: What You Need To Know About Bus Accidents

It is a headline that no parent wants to read in their morning news briefing: a school bus was involved in accident. In fact, no person wants to believe that children and students are anything but safe when being transported to and from home to the classroom, sporting events or other extracurricular activities. The reality, however, is that school buses and other transportation for students use the same highways and roadways as we do in our everyday commutes. Merely because a school bus is brightly colored or marked does not mean that it is immune from the dangers caused by careless or reckless drivers.

School Bus and Seat Belts

One unique aspect of crashes involving school buses that is not typically found in everyday car accidents is the fact that the individuals inside the bus are typically unrestrained. While recent laws in some states have required that school buses be equipped with safety belts, as many school districts have found, enforcement of the seat belt laws is nearly impossible when it comes to a bus full of children. Regardless of the warnings that students receive about the dangers of riding in a motor vehicle without a safety belt, many do not listen until it is too late. Seat belts for school buses are not mandatory under Illinois law, but that does not mean the driver and/or the school district is off the hook for the safety of those entrusted into their care.

Fault Issues and Liability

In many school districts, the district owns the buses that are used to transport students. However, some districts contract their transportation services out to private companies. Determining who is liable for victims’ damages in the event of an accident should first begin with an inquiry into ownership of the buses and any agreements involving the school in this regard. Another consideration when attempting to recover damages for injured victims and their families is whether the driver of the bus was acting in accordance with applicable standards at the time of the accident. Questions that should be asked include those that delve into the driver’s driving record, training that he or she has received, and whether he or she was distracted at the time the accident occurred. One additional consideration that can be overlooked in the moments after an accident involving a school bus is whether the bus itself was in proper working order at the time of the crash. Investigating the maintenance records for the individual bus can be key to a later determination of liability.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.

Questions?
If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident involving a school bus, call someone who can answer your questions and help you obtain the relief you need to put your life back on track. The attorneys at the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. in Woodstock are experienced in Illinois laws governing auto accidents and can provide you advice, or representation if necessary. Nobody wants to think about their child being injured in an accident, but the moments and days following a crash can be crucial to ensuring that they receive the immediate care they need as well as what they may need in the future.

 

 

America’s Love of Dogs Leads to Increased Liability

There is no argument that Americans love their pets, and this is especially true for dogs. In fact, there has been a lot of growth in recent years in industries that cater to pets and pet owners. One industry group projects that pet owners in the U.S. will spend up to $60.59 billion on their pets in 2015. However, the rise in pampered pets has also led to a rise in another area of law, specifically involving dog bites and attacks. According to a recent review, almost one third of homeowners’ liability claims in the United States can be attributed to dog bite claims. Being bitten by someone else’s pet can lead to serious injury and even death, and it is important to know your rights if you or someone you love has been bitten.

Homeowner’s Insurance Coverage

Most people who own their own home have insurance that will provide them with coverage in the event that someone is injured on their property. People expect that such coverage extends to slip and fall accidents, open hazards and damage caused by family members. What often slips under the radar is the fact that a person may also be liable for damage caused to others by their pets, and that these damages are typically covered under a homeowner’s insurance policies.

How to Recover

Unfortunately for victims of dog bites, their injuries tend to occur very quickly and involve personal relationships such as neighbors, friends and family members. No pet owner wants to believe that their beloved dog is capable of causing serious harm to someone, so these types of injuries can be downplayed or quickly covered up by a fast offer of settlement. It may take the form of the dog’s owner offering to pay for a medical bill out of the kindness of their heart, but in reality it is often far too little to cover the actual damages caused by the dog’s aggressiveness. It may take facing legal action for the homeowner to realize that they should submit a claim to their insurer in order to obtain sufficient money to provide complete relief to the dog bite victim.

Damages

When an animal bites someone, it is often more dangerous than other wounds made by man-made objects like knives. This is because an animal’s teeth are designed to tear and rip, similarly to human teeth, and unlike metal blades or other man-made objects, those teeth are covered in the same bacteria that grow and live inside the animal’s mouth. When a dog bites, those teeth can act as a direct conduit, transferring the dog’s mouth bacteria directly into the person’s body via the wound. Among other possible damage (i.e. rabies), this risk of infection is one reason that an injured person may want to seek treatment and be on their way to recovery before accepting any offers of settlement in a dog bite case. A bite that appears to be superficial at first has the potential to turn into a long-lasting and complicated infection if not treated properly.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.
If you or someone you know has been bitten or attacked by a dog, call the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. in Buffalo Grove today. We can discuss your situation and help you assess the full spectrum of damages that you are entitled to recover.

 

 

 

Accountability in Nursing Home Negligence Cases: Bill Update and Discussion

A bill that would allow cameras to be installed in nursing homes has been pending since last year, and has yet to be signed by Illinois’ Governor Bruce Rauner.  The bill has now passed both houses of the Illinois General Assembly and has been sitting on Governor Rauner’s desk since June 29, 2015.  If he approves the bill or fails to take action within 60 days of receiving the bill, it will become law.  So far the governor’s office has been quiet as to his leanings, but whatever he decides nursing home negligence is a problem that does not seem to be going away on its own.

Nursing Home Negligence: A Unique Beast

Any time government agencies discuss increased surveillance as an option to decrease crime, it opens up a long-running debate between those who believe cameras are key law enforcement tools and those who believe they violate individual privacy considerations.  Nursing home negligence is not an ordinary crime, however, nor is it something that is easily proven through more traditional investigative methods.  The unique nature of nursing home negligence includes the fact that it affects a very vulnerable population, is easily covered up by innocent explanations, and involves an industry that is heavily regulated and at the same time neglected by governments across the country by weak enforcement.

Surveillance: Pros and Cons

Those in favor of adding cameras to nursing homes argue that they will increase visibility of what exactly goes on after visitors have gone home.  Unexplained bruising, sudden changes in loved ones’ behavior, and unexpected financial transactions for services that are difficult to prove were provided are harder to sweep under the rug if there is a video of what happened every second that you were not with your loved one.

Opponents often concur in the bill’s noble goal of preventing elder abuse in nursing homes, but view the use of cameras as an inappropriate method to achieve that goal.  They argue that the privacy concerns of the residents and staff members trump any potential protection offered by the use of cameras.  A primary concern of some is with regard to who will make the decision to place a camera in a resident’s room.  If one resident’s legal guardian decides that a camera is a good idea for their loved one’s room, but the individual’s roommate opposes such an idea, how will the nursing home solve the problem?  Fear of intrusive use of cameras in living areas also brings to light ideas of “big brother” watching over loved ones in their most private moments.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens

Need Help?
As Abraham Lincoln famously said, “A law without enforcement is just good advice.”  This cannot be better shown than in the area of nursing home negligence, which depends on the enforcement actions brought by private citizens in the courts to deter further violation from offending institutions.  Whether or not the governor signs the camera bill into law, one thing is clear:  nursing home negligence cannot go unpunished.

Facilities must be held to the highest standards in order to protect our loved ones entrusted to their care.  If you believe your loved one has been victimized by negligence of assisted living personnel, call the Lake County attorneys at the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. today.  We can help answer your questions and get help for your loved ones who deserve the highest quality care.

 

 

Man Killed in Head-On Collision in Beach Park

A Waukegan man was killed Monday evening when driving a 2002 Saturn westbound on West Yorkhouse Road west of North Avenue in Beach Park. According to the Lake County sheriff’s office, the vehicle was travelling westbound when it entered the easbound lane and was struck by a Dodge truck at about 8:30 pm. The man was taken to Vista Medical Center East in Waukegan where he was pronounced dead.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens is a wrongful death and auto accident law firm with offices located in Lake County. Contact us today for a free initial consultation.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens

 

Who’s at fault? Agency and Ownership issues

In the moments following a car accident it is often difficult to think clearly.  Accident victims are immediately concerned with whether they or their loved ones are injured.  Determinations of who was at fault for the accident are not often made until hours or even days after an accident has occurred.  In some situations the first police officer on the scene may make a determination as to fault by issuing a citation.  However, in more complicated situations, even if an officer issues a citation it does not encompass the full picture of who is at fault.  Situations such as this often involve someone who was driving a car that did not belong to them, such as a work vehicle.  What happens if the driver who caused the accident was a professional driver in a company vehicle, or if the at fault driver was negligently allowed to drive someone else’s vehicle?

What is Agency?

These questions involve the legal idea of agency, which is defined by Illinois law as when one person is performing an act on behalf of another.  In a car accident scenario, it is possible that the at fault driver was running an errand for a friend or family member, or performing a task for his or her employer at the time of the accident.

Recovery

Recovering damages from the driver of the vehicle may not be possible for a variety of reasons.  Sometimes, an individual does not have the proper insurance to cover the accident.  This leaves the victim, and the victim’s insurance carrier, on the hook to pay for medical expenses, property damage and any other costs stemming from the accident.  Many people may not realize that when a driver is in an agency relationship with another person at the time of an accident, the other party (also called the ‘principal’) may be liable for some or all of the damages from the accident.

In order for an employer to be liable for its employee driver, it must be shown that an employee-employer relationship existed at the time of the accident and that the employee was acting in furtherance of employment.  The first part of the inquiry is fairly simple, but the latter part is often where parties turn to the court system for liability decisions.  What “in furtherance of” typically means is that the at fault driver was actually performing some duties of his or her employment at the time of the accident.  If it is found that the driver was running a personal errand, but happened to use the company’s truck, the company may not be liable.

Family and friends negligently allowing someone use of their personal car is a bit different.  In this scenario, a common case involves a parent negligently allowing an uninsured child to drive their car to run an errand on their behalf.  If the child is involved in an accident, the injured person may seek to recover damages from the parents’ insurance company.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, Injury Law Firm

Questions?
Agency determinations are not always the most natural considerations by someone who has been injured in a car accident.  They are, however, very important to consider in order to avoid being the one left holding the bill for an accident you had no fault in causing.  If you or a loved one has been injured in a car accident in Waukegan, contact the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. today.  Our skilled attorneys can speak to you about your case and help you determine who may be liable to pay for your injuries.

 

Recovery After Death: Illinois’ Survival Act

If someone dies and the cause of their death can be linked to the negligence of another person, the family of the deceased may file a wrongful death action against the wrongdoer.  These types of lawsuits are designed to help those who depended on the victim for support while he or she was alive.  Therefore, the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit lies with the living family members of the deceased person. In Illinois, there is another way to make sure the victim’s rights to recover are not lost after death.  This right was created by the Illinois’ Survival Act and preserves the victim’s rights by instilling these rights in their estate. Knowing the difference can have a significant effect on recovery after a loved one’s death, and ensuring that the responsible party is held accountable.

Illinois Survival Act Basics

The Act allows the deceased’s representative to bring an action against the alleged wrongdoer in order to recover damages in place of the victim.  The law was created to ensure that the rights of the decedent were protected, as they are separate from the rights of his or her relatives in a wrongful death lawsuit.  It also allows for the estate of the deceased to receive compensation that otherwise would have been owed to the victim by the negligent actor, but for his or her death.  These damages include medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering attributable to the negligence.

Damages

Since the interested plaintiff in a survival action is the estate of the deceased (stepping in for the decedent), any damages that are recovered pursuant to the lawsuit are paid directly to the estate.  The funds are then distributed according to the decedent’s will and/or probate rules.  This differs from a wrongful death action in that any damages from this type of action are distributed directly to the deceased’s next of kin.  While it may seem that there is little difference between the decedent’s will and the next of kin, it is possible for these to be completely different as the court will decide who is considered ‘next of kin’ under Illinois probate rules.  After all, it is not too difficult to imagine that the person or persons who are listed in a decedent’s will may not be the exact same individuals who are considered next in line under Illinois’ probate rules.  By bringing a separate survivor action, the representative in charge of the decedent’s estate can ensure that the individuals who receive money after his or her death are those that were intended.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.

Need Help?
If your loved one has passed due to another person’s negligent behavior, call the Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C. today and speak to one of our knowledgeable Buffalo Grove attorneys.  Pursuing a wrongful death action and/or a survivor action is something that you do not have to do alone.  Let our experienced staff help you ensure that your family is taken care of following the loss of a loved one to someone’s negligent behavior.