Do You Know The Success Rate For Hip Surgery?

hip surgery

If you have problems and pain with your hip, you may be considering or already have had surgery. Unfortunately, there are often problems with hip surgeries, and some patients end up having more problems and pain than they did before.

Keep reading to learn about the troubling success rate for a specific type of hip surgery. If you had hip surgery in Antioch or the surrounding area and are displeased with the results, speak to our Antioch medical malpractice attorneys at The Law Office of Robert T. Edens. Mr. Edens and his staff have fought for the rights of medical malpractice victims for 20 years.

Overview of Surgery For Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS)

Hip arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS) is more common yearly. FAIS is a painful hip condition that has many symptoms, clinical signs, and deformities in the bones. Symptoms can include groin and hip pain, clicking, catching, locking, and stiffness in the hip. Also, some patients have a decreased range of motion in the affected hip, particularly internal rotation and flexion.

To be diagnosed with FAIS, the patient must have bone problems as well as symptoms and clinical signs. Muscle tightness, poor mobility, bone morphology, and a dearth of motor control can lead to discomfort, pain, and even arthritis in the hip.

However, many doctors and surgeons focus only on one aspect of FAIS: problems with the bones. However, the patient outcomes when the focus is only on bone problems could be better, as a recent clinical study showed.

In the study ‘How Many Patients Achieve an Acceptable Symptom State After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome?’, researchers asked patients if they had a significant improvement in their condition after surgery. Unfortunately, only 46% of patients reported that the surgery had contributed to a substantial improvement in their condition.

Also, only 40% of patients were happy with their symptoms related to their ability to enjoy their favorite sports. The researchers also cited related studies that found similar results after FAIS hip arthroscopy. In many cases, a favorable outcome to the surgery was approximately 50/50 – a coin flip.

Potential Negative Side Effects Of FAIS Surgery

This surgery can benefit some patients with hip pain, but far from everyone. The study above shows that doctors and surgeons must weigh the possible risks vs. benefits carefully. Some of the possible side effects of the surgery are:

  • Nerve damage
  • Excessive bleeding into the joint
  • Blood clots
  • Bone death
  • Chronic pain
  • Infection

If you had FAIS hip arthroscopy and are displeased with your outcome, you are not alone. Some of these cases could be the basis for a medical malpractice claim, so have your case reviewed by an attorney.

Speak To Our Antioch Medical Malpractice Attorneys

To learn if you have a medical malpractice case, speak to our Antioch medical malpractice attorneys at The Law Office of Robert T. Edens at (847) 395-2200. Since 1991, Mr. Edens and his staff have represented many medical malpractice clients and obtained millions in damages for their clients. His strong success record has earned the law firm the respect of insurance companies; they know Mr. Edens will fight hard for his clients to get the money they deserve.

Medical Malpractice: Do I Have a Case for Medical Malpractice?

Malpractice AttorneyUnderstanding Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice is known as any undue harm caused by the professional negligence of a doctor, medical staff, nurse, or any other medical practitioner. When a person is severely injured, mentally, physically or both, and there is proof of negligence on part of the doctor/staff, the plaintiff is thereby liable to file a medical malpractice suit against the hospital/medical institution.

Proving Malpractice Cases

If you believe you are a victim of a medical malpractice, it’s essential to understand the many complexities involved in proving negligence in such cases. Medical conditions and their diagnosis are challenging, there are many aspects a doctor must consider before suggesting a treatment. In some cases, there could be an underlying condition that may have caused harm to the patient, in such cases, the doctor or any other medical professional cannot be held liable for negligence and resulting compensation.

Doctrine of “res ipsa loquitur”

To prove negligence, one of the most essential factors is the Doctrine of ‘res ipsa loquitur,’ a Latin phrase meaning ‘the thing speaks for itself.’ If your personal injury is a result of a medical malpractice, you as the plaintiff can invoke the law of res ipsa loquitur. It will help you prove the accident leading to your personal injury would not have happened or could have been prevented if the defendant was not being negligent.

For instance, if you went in for surgery and the surgeon forgot a particular medical equipment to successfully conduct the surgery or operated on the wrong part of body – then you would not have suffered a personal injury. You will need the assistance of an experienced medical malpractice attorney to help you file a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Statutes of Limitation

The Illinois medical malpractice statute of limitation allows plaintiffs to have a longer deadline if their personal injury caused by medical malpractice is not immediately discovered. The plaintiff has about four years to bring forward any evidence of malpractice with medical reports proving the claims. For minors (under the age of 18), the medical malpractice claim can be filed within in eight (8) years after they suffered an injury from a medical malpractice.

Personal Injury Attorney

If you wish to find out more about personal injury cases associated with medical malpractice in Illinois, schedule a free consultation by contacting the offices of Robert Edens at (847) 395-2200 to speak with an experienced personal injury lawyer.

Effect of Comparative Negligence on a Medical Malpractice Claim in Illinois

Medical Malpractice AttorneyMedical malpractice claims are influenced by numerous factors, and are difficult to prove, even though it may seem like an open and shut case to the plaintiff. Generally, when a patient files a claim, it is to recover damages caused due to the negligence or malpractice on part of the doctor, staff, or hospital. However, in order to defend themselves, doctors or hospitals try to pin the blame onto the patient by establishing that they have been negligent with the prescribed treatment that worsened their condition or hampered their recovery.

Similar to personal injury cases, the legal concept of comparative negligence applies where the court evaluates how much the plaintiff contributed to the injury or situation. It is important to understand how comparative negligence can affect your case and the amount of compensation you could otherwise have received.

Understanding Comparative Negligence in a Medical Malpractice Claim

Comparative negligence refers to any defense that a defendant may use to make the plaintiff liable for the assertions to a certain degree in a tort claim. In other words, the defendant may bring facts into light to show the court that the plaintiff played a part, exacerbated, contributed to, or caused the damages or some of the damages for which the plaintiff is making a claim.

Here is an example to help you understand. Imagine that you were injured in an auto accident and were taken to the ER to get treatment. The doctor examined you and recommended that you get admitted for a day or two to further evaluate your condition. You got yourself admitted, and two days later, got discharged. The doctor prescribed a few medicines and a follow-up, but you felt better and didn’t think you should complete the medication course and go for a follow-up. After a few weeks, your injury worsened and you filed a claim against the doctor for medical malpractice. In such a situation, you are partly at fault, and comparative negligence will be applied to your case to determine the extent of the defendant’s liability.

What is meant by Modified Comparative Negligence?

In Illinois, the modified comparative negligence rule is followed in tort claims, such as medical malpractice. When you file a medical malpractice claim, you will not be awarded any compensation if you are over 50 percent at fault for the injury or condition. If the fault is under 50 percent, you will be awarded compensation, but the amount will decrease as the percentage increases. This means that when you are at 5 percent fault, you will get higher amount of compensation for your damages than at 40 percent.

Personal Injury Attorney

Whether the doctor is partly or completely at fault for your injuries, it is essential that you retain competent legal counsel from a reliable medical malpractice attorney to better understand your case and plan your way forward. This is because if you are more responsible for your injuries than the doctor, you will lose the case, while incurring costs of the legal procedure. Contact us at (847) 395-2200 or online today to schedule your initial consultation.

Attain Legal Representation for Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice refers to the problems and injuries that are caused by neglectful behavior of medical professionals. It refers to a situation where a medical professional either failed to provide an important healthcare service to a suffering patient or when it can be established that the quality of the provided care fell below the acceptable standards. Medical malpractice cases are important for people who suffer from neglect and good lawyers can provide compensation for the loss experienced by such people.

Medical malpractice has become very common in the United States. According to the reputed Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), it is the third leading cause of death in the country. Around half the cases of malpractice occur due to an incorrect diagnosis while others usually result due to poorly administered medical procedures. This trend truly needs to be curbed down and for this to occur; people have to take their medical malpractice incidents seriously.

The Scope of Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice has a vast scope and includes many claims that may arise due to a number of reasons. Some of the top reasons are listed here:

  • Delayed Diagnosis
  • Professional Carelessness
  • Misinterpreted Medical Reports
  • Absence of Informed Consent
  • Pharmaceutical Errors

These are some of the important causes that create serious problems for patients.

Statute of Limitations

Within Illinois, all medical malpractice cases are bound by a strict statute of limitations policy. This leaves no room for contemplating on an issue as you have to hurry and file a complaint against a medical practitioner or healthcare organization. A consultation with an able attorney will go a long way in protecting your rights and those of your loved ones in a case involving medical malpractice.

Advantages of Legal Representation

Legal representation affords many advantages. You are able to establish your position as an affected person in front of a relevant authority. You also get several other benefits when obtaining legal representation on medical malpractice issues, such as:

Obtaining Fair Compensation

You can obtain the compensation you deserve when you hire a seasoned lawyer as they have experience necessary to get fight on your behalf. This compensation amount includes all the charges and expenses that a person has to bear due to a malpractice issue.

Identifying the Culprit

There are many situations where you receive medical care from a variety of sources and no one is willing to take the blame in case of a troubling issue. Competent legal representation will allow the blame to be placed on the right medical care individual that makes it easier to build a powerful case and present it in the right way.

The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C.

Robert Edens is an experienced Lake and McHenry County personal injury and medical malpractice attorney. You can contact him by calling (847) 395-2200 today for a free, no-obligation initial consultation.