A serious work injury can mean you need medical care long after your first treatment is over. You might need more surgery, injections, physical therapy, medications, tests, equipment, or regular doctor visits. These future costs are especially important when settling an Illinois workers’ compensation case. A settlement may give you money now, but you could be giving up your employer’s responsibility for future medical care related to your injury. Before we suggest accepting a settlement, we look at both your past costs and what your injury might cost you in the future.
For injured workers in Antioch and across Illinois, future medical care is often a key part of settlement talks. If you close your medical rights and later find out your treatment costs more than expected, you usually cannot reopen the settlement just because the money was not enough.
Section 8(a) of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act, 820 ILCS 305/8(a), establishes an employer’s responsibility for medical treatment related to a compensable workplace injury. The statute requires an employer to provide and pay for necessary medical, surgical, and hospital services that are reasonably required to cure or relieve the effects of the accidental injury, subject to the Act’s requirements and limitations.
This obligation can be extremely valuable when an injury creates continuing medical needs.
If you hurt your back at work and your doctor thinks you might need back surgery in the future, that possible surgery is still an important part of your workers’ compensation case, even if you return to work before it happens. The same goes if your doctor expects you will need injections, more therapy, pain management, follow-up scans, medication, or new medical equipment. That’s why we look beyond your current condition when reviewing a settlement. We want to know what your doctors think you might need in the future.
An Illinois workers’ compensation settlement is more than just a payment for your injury. The wording decides which rights you are giving up.
The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission explains that an approved settlement contract generally terminates an employee’s rights to future cash and medical benefits, even if the employee’s condition later worsens. If the parties intend to keep a particular benefit open, that must be clearly stated in the settlement contract.
The Commission’s settlement form makes this consequence especially clear. It informs an injured employee that, by entering the settlement, the employee generally gives up the right to further medical treatment at the employer’s expense for the effects of the injury and the right to additional benefits if the condition worsens.
That is why we treat future medical expenses as a serious part of settlement negotiations rather than an afterthought.
When a settlement will close future medical rights, anticipated medical expenses may become part of the negotiations over how much the claim is worth.
We might look at your doctor’s recommendations, your medical records, possible surgeries, medication needs, therapy, follow-up care, and other evidence to see what treatment you may need.
For example, if your orthopedic surgeon thinks you will need a knee replacement in the future because of your work injury, the insurer may want to end its responsibility for that care. We want to make sure that possible surgery and related treatment are included when deciding if the settlement is fair for you.
It’s important to note that even if your settlement includes money for future medical care, this does not mean your employer will still pay those bills. If your medical rights are closed, you are usually responsible for future treatment after the settlement, except for what Medicare or other coverage may handle.
It can be risky to settle a workers’ compensation case when you are not sure what treatment you will need in the future. Consider an injured worker who accepts a settlement while a physician is still determining whether shoulder surgery will be necessary. Several months later, the worker’s condition deteriorates, and surgery becomes unavoidable. If the approved settlement closed future medical rights, the worker generally cannot simply return to the employer and demand payment because the treatment turned out to be more extensive than anticipated.
For this reason, we often want a clear medical picture before placing a value on future medical exposure.
We look at whether you have reached maximum medical improvement, if more treatment is recommended, if surgery is likely, if you will need ongoing medication, and if your condition might get worse.
Current medical information is also important to the settlement approval process. The IWCC identifies a lack of current medical information concerning the petitioner’s condition as one reason settlement contracts may be returned without approval.
Potentially. Not every settlement must be structured identically. The IWCC states that although an approved settlement generally terminates future benefits, the parties can preserve a benefit if that intention is clearly stated in the settlement contract.
Whether an employer and its insurer will agree to leave medical rights open is another matter. Insurers often seek finality when resolving claims and may prefer to eliminate future exposure.
When continued medical coverage is being considered, the settlement language becomes critical. We want the agreement to state precisely which rights remain open and which are being resolved.
You should never assume future medical treatment remains covered merely because the settlement document does not seem clear to you. The terms should be understood before the agreement is signed and approved.
Illinois law places an important safeguard around workers’ compensation settlements. Under Section 23 of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act, 820 ILCS 305/23, an employee cannot waive compensation rights through a settlement without approval from the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission.
The IWCC likewise explains that an agreement between the employee and employer must be documented and presented for approval and that a settlement is not legally binding as a workers’ compensation settlement unless the Commission approves it.
Commission approval is important, but it should not be confused with individualized legal advice. The arbitrator is a neutral decision-maker. The Commission specifically advises that an arbitrator reviewing a settlement for an unrepresented worker does not act as that employee’s advocate. Our responsibility is different. We evaluate the settlement from your perspective and consider whether giving up future medical rights makes sense in light of your injury and anticipated care.
Medicare adds another layer when a workers’ compensation settlement closes future medical benefits. Federal Medicare Secondary Payer requirements must be considered when resolving a workers’ compensation case involving future medical expenses. The IWCC explains that parties are responsible for protecting Medicare’s interests and that a Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside Arrangement, commonly called a WCMSA, may allocate part of a settlement to future medical expenses that would otherwise be covered by Medicare.
Whether a WCMSA is appropriate and how Medicare’s interests should be addressed depends on the circumstances. This issue is particularly important for workers who already receive Medicare or may become Medicare beneficiaries in the foreseeable future.
A Medicare Set-Aside is not simply extra settlement money to spend for unrelated purposes. The funds are intended for qualifying future medical expenses connected to the workers’ compensation injury, and administration and reporting requirements can apply. We consider Medicare issues before finalizing a settlement so that resolving the workers’ compensation case does not unnecessarily create problems with future Medicare coverage.
A settlement can provide certainty and allow an injured worker to bring a disputed workers’ compensation case to an end. But certainty for the insurer often means transferring future medical risk to the injured employee.
That trade-off deserves careful consideration.
We look at the nature of your injury, your age, medical recommendations, likelihood of future surgery, medication requirements, ongoing therapy, anticipated diagnostic testing, and other reasonably foreseeable treatment. We also consider whether your medical condition is stable enough to make those estimates meaningful. A settlement should be evaluated based on the rights you are surrendering, not simply on whether the check looks attractive today.
Future medical treatment can represent a substantial part of the value of a serious Illinois workers’ compensation claim. Before accepting a settlement, you should understand what treatment your doctors anticipate, what medical rights the agreement closes, whether any medical benefits will remain open, and who will be responsible for injury-related treatment after the settlement.
At The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens, P.C., we represent injured workers and help them evaluate workers’ compensation settlements based on both their present circumstances and their potential future needs. We can review the proposed settlement, medical evidence, anticipated treatment, future medical exposure, and other benefits available under Illinois law before you make a decision that may permanently affect your rights.
If you suffered a workplace injury and are considering an Illinois workers’ compensation settlement, we can help you understand how the agreement may affect your future medical care. Contact our Illinois workers’ compensation attorney at The Law Offices of Robert T. Edens by calling us at 847-395-2200 to receive your free consultation. Before you agree to close your workers’ compensation case, we can help you determine what future medical rights you may be giving up and whether those needs have been adequately addressed in the proposed settlement.